February 7, 2021

Agile VAPT for a better ROI

Agile VAPT for a better ROI

What if I told you that you can increase your secure application release timeline efficiency by 70%? Or in other terms, what if you can release your application 4x in the same timeframe and with assurance that it’s safe from potential vulnerabilities?

Let me take you through the VAPT process which can help you achieve that.

In a traditional process for a security assessment on an application under release, it requires to go through below stages:

  • Penetration Testing: 5 days
  • Report generation: 2 days
  • Remediation of identified issues: 10 days.
  • Re-assessment of remediation process: 2 days
  • Application release: 1 day

Let us look at this traditional approach with timeline perspective:

Due to the communication challenges and different supporting activities which helps in the overall process, it usually takes 22 days for an application to get a signoff for release.

Here is a more efficient approach. The Agile security assessment methodology combines the communication channel and asks for collaboration within a single platform. Automating a few manual processes (like submission of issues on the go, creation of reports etc) to reduce the stakeholder responsibilities within the same platform can help in creating a workflow which helps you achieve the above said efficiency.

Now, let’s look at this time efficient alternative:

This approach makes use of a platform for continuous integration of the entire process and data consumption to get the vulnerabilities on day 1 which can also be started to fix from the same day. This can bring up the release date timeline for an application to just the 7 Days.

In conclusion, the need of the hour is to have a platform which can bring together the stakeholders for better communication and ease out the entire process to increase productivity along the way.

Author: Bhishm Narula

Recent Resources

Dive into our library of resources for expert insights, guides, and in-depth analysis on maximizing Uni5 Xposure’s capabilities
Enterprise security team reviewing vulnerability and exposure data on a shared screen

Rapid7 Competitors: How Security Teams Put It Into Practice

Compare Rapid7 competitors with an enterprise framework for testing coverage, prioritization, validation, and remediation across exposure management.
Read More
Enterprise security analysts reviewing vulnerability risk data on a workstation

EPSS vs CVSS: An Enterprise Framework for Safer Decisions

EPSS vs CVSS for enterprise teams: compare severity and exploit likelihood, add asset context, and build a practical exposure prioritization workflow.
Read More

Biggest Patch Tuesday ever - October. 4 Windows CVEs contributed : Part-2

Read More
Security analysts reviewing vulnerability scan findings across enterprise cloud and on-premises systems

Vulnerability Assessment Scanner: How Enterprise Teams Should Evaluate It

Learn how to evaluate a vulnerability assessment scanner for enterprise coverage, context, validation, and remediation, then turn findings into lower exposure.
Read More

Biggest Patch Tuesday ever - October. 4 Windows CVEs contributed : Part-1

Read More
Enterprise security analysts reviewing endpoint alerts and vulnerability exposure data on large monitors

Rapid7 vs SentinelOne: Comparing Security Operations and Exposure Workflows

Compare Rapid7 vs SentinelOne by workflow, coverage, prioritization, response, and integrations. Use this checklist to assess enterprise fit.
Read More

What’s new on Hive Pro?

Get through updates and upcoming events, and more directly in your inbox

Reduce real exposure. Not just vulnerability volume.