Deployment & Time to Value
Zero deployment complexity and Quick time to value
- No console/app install required
- Single SaaS Console for on-prem, cloud and remote assets
Benefits
Antiquated architecture and Complex deployment, long time to value
- Requires Console + scanners to be deployed in network
- Separate console for on-prem vs cloud and remote assets adding management complexity
Drawback
Time to value is 3–4 weeks because of complicated deployment and change managementAsset Coverage & Vendor/Platform Consolidation
Complete Asset Coverage and Unified View
- One platform and single view for exposures for all assets: endpoints, servers, cloud, containers, mobile, applications, code, IoT, etc.
Benefits
Unified view of exposure, single pane of glass, single vendor Partial Asset Coverage and Multiple Platforms
- Limited Coverage (no code analysis/SCA)
- Multiple consoles for different assets, missing unified view
Drawback
Multiple vendor management, higher cost and complex operationsActionable Risk Score
Real Risk Score (Range 1–100)
- Considers vulnerability severity, age, access, attack complexity, threat intel — Global, Industry and regional, asset criticality, business impact, security controls and attack feasibility
Benefits
Practical Risk Score, Targeted exposure reduction and remediation, high ROI Incomplete and Theoretical Risk Score (Range 1–1000)
- One size fits all score — based only on vulnerabilities and threat intel
- Ignores security controls in place and doesn't evaluate attack feasibility
Drawback
Misleading and inactionable risk score. High efforts and Low exposure reduction
